He said, “The truth of the matter is, there are usually two sides to a coin, and that’s one of the dynamics of economics. As you are trying to solve a problem, you are likely to be creating another. While it is good to crash or bring down the cost of food, being the first line of human needs, we have to consider how they intend to do it. If the government wants to crash the price of food by importing food into the country or by removing the tariff, as they said, it has implications.

“Yes, on one side, it would be a good thing for the populace because they will be able to buy food at affordable prices. However, the other part of it is the locally grown food items and the cost of producing them, which will affect the price. If the price of food that is produced locally is higher than that of the ones being imported, it would be to the detriment of the locally produced food.”

Kuti-George canvassed for subsidies on the cost of production of locally produced food or off-take of their food.

He advised, “So, what the government can do in that instance, therefore, is to subsidise the cost of production of the locally produced food or off-take their food, buy it at the price that will give them profit, and then sell it in the market at lower prices. While it is good for the populace to have lower prices of food items, we have to think of how we are doing it.

“The long-term solution would be to boost local production of food items so that when it is available when there is supply, prices will normally come down. How that can be done is to subsidise agricultural inputs, provide modern technology for agriculture, and fund farmers massively through their cooperatives and associations.”

According to him, the issue of security is also on the front burner of what needs to be addressed by the Federal Government.

He added, “We must not forget the fact that the issue of security has to be taken care of. Even where farmers are ready to farm, where you have inputs supplied, where you have modern agricultural implements such as tractors and so on, if people cannot go to their farms, or they go to their farms and bring their cattle to graze, we still come back to the issue of food scarcity. So, this issue of security is very, very critical.

“I learned that President Tinubu is forming a Ministry of Livestock. Well, I do not understand the sense behind that, but I don’t see it solving the problem. What we need is to equip our military to go in there and deal with the situation.

“We can also put laws in place. If you graze your cattle on my land, there is a place to report, and action will be taken. By the time one, two, or three people are jailed or their animals seized, others will learn a lesson.”

Meanwhile, a member of the Nigerian Economic Summit Group, Dr Ikenna Nwosu, said it was not optimal to comment on an expressed intention.

He said, “When the Federal Government unfolds the measures for crashing the food prices, the duration of the intervention, and the plans for long-term food price control, then the appropriate evaluation will be undertaken, including socioeconomic implications and how the measures reflect the policy targets for food security set out in Nigeria’s Medium Term National Development Plan 2021-2025. For now, the public is simply listening to the Federal Government rhetoric, while awaiting the measures.”

Punch